Surendranath Potu
Top achievements
Rank 1
Rank 1
Surendranath Potu
asked on 16 Jan 2012, 01:42 PM
Hi ,
Could you please let me know if there is any way that we can pass the loop count through a variable .
Thanks in advance
Thanks
Surendranath
Could you please let me know if there is any way that we can pass the loop count through a variable .
Thanks in advance
Thanks
Surendranath
5 Answers, 1 is accepted
0
Hello Surendranath,
2. Use a standard Loop step that includes actions and verifications as standard steps. Insert a coded step in the Loop. You'll need to press View Class to see the Code-Behind File and add an additional line of code outside of the coded step:
3. If you truly wish to create a variable you can later use to Attach to an Input Value or Attach to a Verification, use the following approach which Gets and Sets an Extracted Value in code.
Use a standard Loop step that includes actions and verifications as standard steps. Insert an additional coded step in the Loop with the following:
Now you can data bind a later step using $(iter) via data binding.
All the best,
Anthony
the Telerik team
There are a few approaches here depending on your desired implementation.
1. Perform loop and its actions entirely in a Coded Step:
int count = 3;for (int i = 1; i <= count; i++){ //Some action/verification Log.WriteLine("Loop count = " + i.ToString());}2. Use a standard Loop step that includes actions and verifications as standard steps. Insert a coded step in the Loop. You'll need to press View Class to see the Code-Behind File and add an additional line of code outside of the coded step:
public int count; [CodedStep(@"New Coded Step")]public void LoopCountVariable_CodedStep1(){ count++; Log.WriteLine(count.ToString());}3. If you truly wish to create a variable you can later use to Attach to an Input Value or Attach to a Verification, use the following approach which Gets and Sets an Extracted Value in code.
Use a standard Loop step that includes actions and verifications as standard steps. Insert an additional coded step in the Loop with the following:
object count;try{ count = (int)GetExtractedValue("iter") + 1;}catch{ count = 1;} SetExtractedValue("iter", count);Log.WriteLine(count.ToString());Now you can data bind a later step using $(iter) via data binding.
All the best,
Anthony
the Telerik team
Do you want to have your say when we set our development plans?
Do you want to know when a feature you care about is added or when a bug fixed?
Explore the
Telerik Public Issue Tracking
system and vote to affect the priority of the items
0
Surendranath Potu
Top achievements
Rank 1
Rank 1
answered on 17 Jan 2012, 06:47 PM
Hi Anthony ,
Thank you very much for your reply.
I have another query ...
It is regarding radsplitter .
RadSplitter is used in one of the pages in my application . Based on the part of the page that is visible ( currently I'm viewing ) , I have to do some operations on my webpage . But when I tried to identify which part of the web page I'm viewing by using "Verify if a perticular element is visible " , even though I'm not seeing that element ( i.e I'm seeing other part of the page which is behind ) , It is showing that that element is visible .
Can you please guide me how can I identify if a Radsplitter is expanded or not using our test studio .
So that I can understand which part of the page I'm in ..
Donno If I could able to explain the problem clearly .
By Hoping you got my point , waiting for your reply .
Regards ,
Surendranath
Thank you very much for your reply.
I have another query ...
It is regarding radsplitter .
RadSplitter is used in one of the pages in my application . Based on the part of the page that is visible ( currently I'm viewing ) , I have to do some operations on my webpage . But when I tried to identify which part of the web page I'm viewing by using "Verify if a perticular element is visible " , even though I'm not seeing that element ( i.e I'm seeing other part of the page which is behind ) , It is showing that that element is visible .
Can you please guide me how can I identify if a Radsplitter is expanded or not using our test studio .
So that I can understand which part of the page I'm in ..
Donno If I could able to explain the problem clearly .
By Hoping you got my point , waiting for your reply .
Regards ,
Surendranath
0
Hello Surendranath,
Anthony
the Telerik team
I am not able to reproduce the described behavior against this Telerik demo site. Please see the following screen recording where a "Is Visible" Verification properly fails after a RadSplitBar is collapsed:
http://screencast.com/t/JkNx2VXPtXWV
If you continue to have difficulty, please provide a public site, or even a sample test (within a .zip file), that demonstrates the issue.
Anthony
the Telerik team
Do you want to have your say when we set our development plans?
Do you want to know when a feature you care about is added or when a bug fixed?
Explore the
Telerik Public Issue Tracking
system and vote to affect the priority of the items
0
Vijula
Top achievements
Rank 1
Rank 1
answered on 03 Sep 2013, 01:25 PM
Hi,
I am using latest version if Telerik 2013 R1. But with the above solutions provided for binding the loop did not work for me.
I need to run the loop for a specific time with some verification inside loop. I cannot keep the verification as a coded step since the element under verification is data binded. Can you please provide exact steps to data bind the looping counter.
Thanks,
Vijula
I am using latest version if Telerik 2013 R1. But with the above solutions provided for binding the loop did not work for me.
I need to run the loop for a specific time with some verification inside loop. I cannot keep the verification as a coded step since the element under verification is data binded. Can you please provide exact steps to data bind the looping counter.
Thanks,
Vijula
0
Hi Vijula,
I am sorry to hear that you are experiencing this issue.
I can see that my colleague, Anthony, has provided the different ways for doing this, depending on your testing scenario.
In order to help you, I will need to know more about your testing scenario:
1) Please provide us with a copy of your test and if it is possible grant us access to your application so we can reproduce the issue on our end and give you a solution.
2) A Jing video demonstrating the issue may also help us to better understand what is happening.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Velin Koychev
Telerik
I am sorry to hear that you are experiencing this issue.
I can see that my colleague, Anthony, has provided the different ways for doing this, depending on your testing scenario.
In order to help you, I will need to know more about your testing scenario:
1) Please provide us with a copy of your test and if it is possible grant us access to your application so we can reproduce the issue on our end and give you a solution.
2) A Jing video demonstrating the issue may also help us to better understand what is happening.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Velin Koychev
Telerik