Hero-Diagonals

AI Observability
for Production Agents

See where workflows break, what they cost, and whether outputs are good enough to ship. Built for teams working in .NET, Python, and JavaScript.

Start Free

No credit card required to start.
5-minute set up.

ai-observability-platform-hero-mobile hero banner background

Turn Production Evidence Into Reliable Releases

Connect every signal across the production loop.
AI agents, LLM apps, RAG systems, and copilots don’t follow simple request-response paths. Trace behavior, debug failures, control spend, and evaluate quality across real production workflows.

1

See execution paths across prompts, models, and tools

  • Latency and tokens
  • Execution paths
  • Outputs
2

Diagnose agent
failures fast

  • Skipped tools
  • Retrieval issues & bad context
  • Loops, retries & errors
3

Track and reduce
AI spend

  • Token usage & estimated cost
  • Models, providers, & agents
  • Workflow patterns
4

Measure and improve
AI outputs

  • LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations
  • Quality scores
  • Prompt, model & workflow changes
Workflow Debugging
Cost Analysis
LLM Evaluations
Datasets & Experiments
Data Export
Prompt Management
Model Optimization
Performance Metrics
AI Playground

Why Production AI Is Hard to
Understand and Operate

No Clear Execution Path

AI agents do not follow a simple request-response path. A single answer can move through prompts, retrieval, tool calls, retries, model responses, and custom workflow logic. Without a full trace, teams are left guessing what happened. 

Failures Do Not Always Look Like Errors 

An agent can return a response while skipping a tool, using stale context, retrieving the wrong source, or failing the task. Teams need AI-specific debugging context, not just application logs.

AI Cost is Shaped by Runtime Behavior

LLM spend changes with prompt size, model choice, retries, tool loops, retrieval patterns, evaluation runs, and workflow volume. Teams need cost and token usage tied to the execution path, not just pricing tables.

Successful Responses Do Not Guarantee Quality 

A response can be fast, complete, and valid-looking while still containing hallucinations, being ungrounded, unsafe, irrelevant, or unhelpful. Teams need repeatable evaluations connected to production traces.

See Progress AI Observability in Action

Explore product views that help teams trace AI behavior, debug agent failures, analyze cost and token usage, and evaluate output quality from real AI execution data.

Understand What your Agent Did

Capture the full path of an agent run across prompts, models, tools, retrieval steps and outputs. See how decisions unfold across multi-step and multi-agent workflows.
What’s measured: spans, model calls, tool calls, retrieval steps, latency, token usage, outputs

Trace Explorer Screenshot

Investigate Why it Failed

Pinpoint where behavior broke down and what to fix next. Diagnose failures using trace-level context from real agent runs.
What’s measured: errors, failed spans, retries, workflow status, tool failures, latency spikes

Investigate Why it Failed Screenshot

Understand What it Costs

Track LLM spend across agents, workflows, models and providers. Identify what is driving cost so teams can optimize usage before it scales.
What’s measured: estimated cost, input tokens, output tokens, cost by model, cost by workflow, usage units

Cost Attribution Screenshot

Understand How Well it Performs

Run LLM-as-a-judge evaluations on captured traces. Score quality, usefulness and policy alignment. Compare prompt, model or workflow changes side by side using real execution data.
What’s measured: evaluation scores, judge verdicts, quality trends, weak responses, prompt/model comparisons, before/after results

Quality Scorecards Screenshot

Get Observable Agents in Minutes

Progress AI Observability fits into your existing agent workflows with lightweight SDKs for .NET, Python, and JavaScript. Start capturing execution data quickly, then use it to understand, debug, and improve agent behavior. 

Instrument your AI agents with lightweight integrations that capture prompts, model calls, todiv usage, retrieval steps and state.

Observe agent behavior end to end using session- and trace-level views designed specifically for multi-step and multi-agent workflows.

Improve reliability, performance, and cost by debugging failures, running evaluations and tuning orchestration and model choices using real production data.

Get Started in Minutes

// .NET - Install & Instrument
// 1. Install
dotnet add package Progress.Observability.Instrumentation
// 2. Instrument
chatClient = chatClient.AddObservability(options =>
{
  options.AppName = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("OBSERVABILITY_APP_NAME")!;
  options.ApiKey  = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("OBSERVABILITY_API_KEY")!;
});
# Python - Install & Instrument
# 1. Install
pip install progress-observability
# 2. Instrument
from progress_observability import Observability; import os
 
Observability.instrument(
  app_name=os.getenv("OBSERVABILITY_APP_NAME"),
  api_key=os.getenv("OBSERVABILITY_API_KEY")
)
// TypeScript - Install & Instrument
// 1. Install
npm install progress-observability
 
// 2. Instrument
import { Observability } from 'progress-observability';
 
Observability.instrument({
  appName: process.env.OBSERVABILITY_APP_NAME,
  apiKey: process.env.OBSERVABILITY_API_KEY
});

“We cut our agent debugging time from 4 hours to 20 minutes. Being able to see the full trace - prompts, retrieval, tool calls - in one view changed how our team works.”

Early Access Program participant


85%faster root cause analysis
3xfaster time to resolution
<5 minto first trace

Who It’s For  

From debugging to governance, built around real AI workflows.

For Developers

Debug Agent Failures in Minutes, Not Days

  • Find where behavior broke down across prompts, retrieval, tools, model calls, retries, and workflow logic
  • Trace hallucinations and weak responses to their source
  • Detect loops, timeouts, skipped tools, and cascading failures

For Engineering Leaders

Control reliability, performance, and cost

  • See agent behavior across workflows, environments, models, providers, and teams
  • Identify inefficient agent behavior and expensive patterns
  • Compare cost, performance, and output quality

For Enterprise Teams

Scale AI systems with control and visibility

  • Maintain trace history and audit trails
  • Manage access, retention, and data residency requirements
  • Support SSO, governance controls, data residency options, and volume-based plans

Pricing

Simple, predictable pricing. Start free, scale as you grow. No surprises, no hidden fees.

Free ForeverFor developers testing early agent prototypes
 
$ 0

per month

Includes 10,000 units

Retention: 7 days

 

  • Agent Trace Explorer
  • LLM request and prompt logging
  • Basic cost and token visibility
  • Basic LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations
  • .NET, Python and TypeScript SDKs
  • Integrations with popular AI frameworks and model providers
StarterFor small teams deploying their first live AI agents
 
$ 29

per month

Includes 200,000 units

Retention: 30 days

$8 USD per additional 100K units

  • Everything in Free, plus:
  • Full Cost Attribution (per-agent, per-model, total costs)
  • Real-Time & Historical LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluations
  • Evaluation Datasets & Experiments
  • Anomaly Detection & Alerting
ProFor teams running production AI agents at scale
 
$ 299

per month

Includes 1,000,000 units

Retention: 60 days

$8 USD per additional 100K units

  • Everything in Starter, plus:
  • SSO Included
EnterpriseFor organizations scaling governed AI applications
Starting at
$ 3,000

per month

Custom trace volume

Retention: Infinite

 

  • Everything in Pro, plus:
  • BYOS data residency options for teams with strict data control requirements
  • Enterprise governance with audit logs, access controls and SLA commitments
  • Custom volume pricing for high-throughput AI applications and AI labs

Works with Your Stack

The Progress AI Observability Platform integrates with the tools, frameworks and platforms teams already use to build and run AI agents.

  • Languages & SDKs: .NET (C#), Python, JavaScript/TypeScript
  • Agent Frameworks: Semantic Kernel, LangChain, LlamaIndex, AutoGen, Microsoft Agent Framework
  • LLM Providers: Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Anthropic
  • AI Tooling: Microsoft.Extensions.AI, Microsoft AI Foundry, Progress RAG
  • Enterprise SSO: Okta, Azure AD, SAML
  • Open‑Source Models (OSS): Llama 2/3, Mistral, Mixtral, Falcon, Gemma, etc.

Development and Production: Use the same observability workflow to debug locally, validate changes, and investigate production behavior. 

aop-stack aop-stack-mobile

Frequently Asked Questions

The most common questions teams ask when evaluating AI observability for production agents.

  • Does this add latency to my agent workflows?
  • What kinds of AI agents does this support?
  • What data does Progress AI Observability capture?
  • Can I use this with my existing observability or monitoring tools?
  • What is AI agent tracing and how is it different from traditional application observability?
  • Is this meant for development, production or ongoing AI improvement?
  • Who is this built for?
  • Is this built for .NET teams or just adapted from Python tooling?
  • How is this different from LangSmith or other AI observability tools?

Capability Specific FAQs

  • How do you debug AI agent failures?
  • Why do production AI costs increase unexpectedly?
  • What is LLM-as-a-judge evaluation?
  • Can production traces be used to improve AI quality?
  • Is this the same as machine learning observability?

Ready to See What Your AI Agents Are Actually Doing?

Get end-to-end visibility into your AI agents in minutes. Free to start, built to scale.

Start Free No credit card required · Free for small teams · Enterprise plans available